THE INTEGRATION OF MEASURABLE AND NON-MEASURABLE INSTRUMENTS IN QUANTITATIVE DA'WAH RESEARCH: AN INNOVATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING DA'WAH EFFICACY

  • Surya Eka Priyatna UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Nuril Huda Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Dina Hermina Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
Keywords: Da’wah Evaluation, Measurement Instrument, Non-Measurement Instrument, Mixed Methods, Islamic Communication Research

Abstract

This article explores the integration of measurement and non-measurement instruments in quantitative research methodology for the evaluation of Islamic da’wah. Recognizing the limitations of using purely quantitative indicators, this study highlights the significance of merging structured numeric tools such as questionnaires with non-measurement approaches like interviews, observations, and digital analytics. Drawing from a synthesis of recent scholarly findings, the study elaborates on methodological, cultural, technological, and ethical challenges. It applies an innovative mixed-method approach that enhances the validity, relevance, and cultural responsiveness of da’wah evaluation models. The findings affirm that integrating these instruments offers a holistic and pragmatic understanding of da’wah effectiveness, especially in measuring cognitive, affective, and behavioral impacts on target audiences. This integration also enables participatory evaluation frameworks, supports data triangulation, and addresses the ethical dilemmas in cross-contextual research. The paper concludes that this integrative approach not only enriches research design but also equips da’wah practitioners with evidence-based strategies that are adaptable to contemporary socio-digital landscapes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cavatorta, Elisa. “Innovations in measurement and the evaluation of human behaviour.” Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL) Yale University, 25 November 2022. https://doi.org/10.51744/CMB9.
Hanif, Muhammad dan Agusman. “INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES IN CONTEMPORARY DA’WAH: INITIATING A TECHNOLOGY-BASED APPROACH: INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES IN CONTEMPORARY DA’WAH: INITIATING A TECHNOLOGY-BASED APPROACH.” Jurnal Da’wah: Risalah Merintis, Da’wah Melanjutkan 6, no. 2 (24 Desember 2023): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.38214/jurnaldawahstidnatsir.v6i2.212.
Hasanah, Risqiatul. “INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY IN DA’WAH: UTILIZATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY AND DA’WAH STRATEGIES OF GUS IQDAM.” IJIC: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Communication 7, no. 1 (2024): 14–38.
Lanfer, Hanna Luetke, Doreen Reifegerste, dan Sorie Ibrahim Kargbo. “Collecting Quantitative Experimental Data from a Non-WEIRD Population: Challenges and Practical Recommendations from a Field Experiment in Rural Sierra Leone.” BMC Research Notes 14, no. 1 (Desember 2021): 414. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05828-w.
Martí, Joel. “Measuring in Action Research: Four Ways of Integrating Quantitative Methods in Participatory Dynamics.” Action Research 14, no. 2 (Juni 2016): 168–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315590883.
Mayoux, Linda, dan Robert Chambers. “Reversing the paradigm: quantification and participatory methods.” Dalam Submitted to the EDIAIS Conference: New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice. University of Manchester, UK, 24:24, 2003.
Mukmin, Mukmin, dan Nuraini Nuraini. “Integrasi Penilaian Tes dan Non-Tes dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Menuju Evaluasi Holistik untuk Pembelajaran Berkelanjutan.” Journal of Instructional and Development Researches 4, no. 5 (31 Oktober 2024): 370–79. https://doi.org/10.53621/jider.v4i5.384.
Murodi, Murodi, Muhtadi Muhtadi, Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana, dan Deden Mauli Darajat. “SHIFTING DAKWAH METHODS TO MATCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION.” Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman 18, no. 1 (19 September 2023): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2023.18.1.93-113.
Petrov, K. Ye., E. N. Minchenko, dan V. S. Lapin. “From quantitative measurement to understanding public demand: Exploring non-survey methods in applied regional research.” Digital Sociology 6, no. 3 (7 Oktober 2023): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2023-6-3-21-33.
Rosli, Roslieza, Razaleigh Muhamat, Abdul Ghafar Don Kawangit, Nur A’thiroh Masyaa’il Tan, dan Ai Pao. “Kajian Rintis Instrumen Soal Selidik Keefektifan kerja Dakwah Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) kepada Mualaf,” 2020.
Syarif, Jamal, Nuril Huda, dan Dina Hermina. “Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam: Studi Literatur Tentang E-Assessment Dan Big Data.” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan 15, no. 2 (25 Desember 2024): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v15i2.51060.
Woolley, Claire M. “Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3, no. 1 (Januari 2009): 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325774.
Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Priyatna, S. E., Huda, N., & Hermina, D. (2025). THE INTEGRATION OF MEASURABLE AND NON-MEASURABLE INSTRUMENTS IN QUANTITATIVE DA’WAH RESEARCH: AN INNOVATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING DA’WAH EFFICACY. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Communication, 8(1), 83 - 112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/ijic.v8i1.2364